Bench Fix Salon Haircut Prices

more positives than negatives for a remarkable and entertaining 'Thor'

Neither Shakespearean top superhero movies nor the disaster that some had hoped and wanted to see. Thor is a remarkable adventure movie, a good adaptation of the Marvel comic book and an interesting exercise in style by Kenneth Branagh. It has lights and shadows in the script, also in the casting. Many more light on the visual aspect, but rather distorts the 3D final result. In any case, the assessment is very positive, because Branagh joins an entertaining cocktail of adventure and fantasy that leaves you wanting more. More than Thor, Asgard over and over, especially the Avengers (the senseless mania for running out of the room almost before the film ends, regardless of blatantly bother other viewers, makes most of which have paid an entry miss a final scene at the end of the credits.) And if the feeling is to want more, the conclusion is that the aftertaste that leaves Thor is sweet and pleasant, which leads to forgive the faults it has. At the end of the day, its mission is to entertain.

Thor is the god of thunder in Norse mythology, suitably adapted to the universe Marvel and Stan Lee (another great cameo his attentive to the truck trying to lift the hammer), Larry Lieber and Jack Kirby large. Its film adaptation could only be done with generous doses of grandeur. Asgard, home of the gods, is in all its splendor and the great success of the film to focus the beginning of history there, in the fantasy realms of this mythology. The easy way, and obviously much cheaper to shoot, it would be so many other fictional characters have followed, send them directly to our Earth to exploit the comic virtues of a strange place in the world we know. But Thor bet the other way and provides about three-quarters initial time filled with action and special effects, visually fantastic (although in some cases comparisons with The Lord of the Rings are inevitable ... and always in favor of the saga yet surpassed Peter Jackson) and narratively interesting. This is where Thor is the haughty, ambitious and warlike, well run by a limited actor, Chris Hemsworth, but visually it is perfect.

In this installment of the film, after a magnificent prologue (and a superfluous opening scene), is where the best of Thor. His relationship with his brother Loki (Tom Hiddleston) and his father Odin (Anthony Hopkins), the balance of peace between the realms of Asgard and Jotunheim (ruled by the giants of ice), his friendship with the Lady Sif (Jaimie Alexander, has anyone thought it could be heroin Hollywood finally allowed to make a fantasy movie with a woman protagonist?) and the three warriors, Volstagg, Fandral and Hogun (Ray Stevenseon, Josh Dallas and Tadanobu Asano), and the vision of the rainbow bridge that connects the Nine Kingdoms and the custodial guardian, Heimdall (splendid character and superb characterization, although the choice of Idris Elba, a black actor to portray a Norse god as an anecdote was stayed, and got absurd attempt to speak of the film long before its release). View visual splendor is achieved in this section, the appropriate level of brutality in the struggles and passion in the portrayal of characters and environments do yearn for a future sequel in which narrate the stage in the comic book was Walter Simonson Thor to visit the kingdom of Hel (the Norse equivalent of hell), ruled by Hela.

With the arrival on the scene of Jane Foster (Natalie Portman), the tone of the film is lowered and it becomes funny. Funny rightly, of course, but more slowly. The love story was not only inevitable, but also grateful, because it gives more meaning to the evolution of Thor. But there is where you begin to notice the shortcomings of the script of the film. Introducing too many elements in two hours of film usually leads to some are hopelessly blurred, and this is evident in the battle between Thor and the Destroyer (a magical giant metallic appearance that shoots a powerful rays from the face.) It distorts so easily to the other Asgardians that hard to believe there is no measure of the heroísimo Thor and the supposedly invincible opponent. Similarly, it is absurd to transform Jane Foster from the nurse who is in the comic to the scientist who is in the movie (sad payment of which are politically correct times) and this aspect is perhaps the most tenuous of the plot, thanks to Natalie Portman does not stand out on paper as well. Also ends up being weak portrait of Loki, whose motivations are too in the air and distort what had only been targeted in the first two installments of the film.

In the visual, fantasy in general (and Thor is the world doing what makes him a valued character in the comic), we can only make two criticisms. One, as usual, is the 3D, too dark a film that cries out to be light to do justice to the work of its designers. Another, Branagh, while triumphs with risky levels diagonal, you lose too much on the fights. Domina great special effects, and that has merit taking into account his films so far away from this field, but the battle choreography are sometimes lost as in many other action movies (there will always be the brilliant music of his Inseperable composer, Patrick Doyle). Branagh, in any case, manages to give consistency to the final outcome and emerge triumphant. The same criticism that made him almost at its inception as the new Orson Welles now enjoys criticizing everything he does (although with less intensity, reminiscent of the phenomenon who suffers M. Night Shyamalan), but there is no reason. Thor works and fits in film Branagh's because, although sometimes it is on the surface, the Shakespearean tragedy is a key element in this saga of Norse gods and their relationship with humans.

mentioned before that final scene, which is best not to reveal more details so as not to spoil the surprise, the film concludes with a message: "Thor returns in The Avengers," which inevitably sparks the desire of the fan. Something else to look at Thor to better understand the combination of this movie in this magnificently drawn cinematorgáfico Marvel Universe? Obviously, the presence of SHIELD Agent Coulson (who appeared in two installments of Iron Man ), but also the screen debut, just a cameo, Hawk Eye (Jeremy Renner), the question of whether the same scene hides something else and the mention of Stark (Tony Stark, the man under the armor Iron Man). Marvel continues to add and there is still a chapter, Captain America, before the final explosion of the characters on the big screen with The Avengers . For that we have to wait until May next year. And given the high level of Iron Man sequel and of The Incredible Hulk and Thor now, we can only expect the best of the film which is already turning Joss Whedon.

Mario Salieri Dvd Online

'The Legion of the Eagle', decent and disconcerting

Eagle The Legion is a decent film so unnerving. It is a film of Romans, because Rome does not appear and we see only centurions in the first half of the film. It is an adventure film to use, it is more thoughtful and careful than is usually normal, not too many action scenes in reality and is rhythmic fluctuations. It is a film of actors, as there is a clear imbalance between cast members, some very interesting and others, most lacking relevance and chemistry. You do not have the strength of other films of its director, Kevin Macdonald, but some interesting notes. And not a movie to leave a glorious taste like Gladiator , but not negative as Centurion. So in the end the thing is that it is an entertaining film, with some positive aspects, but do not go down in history and revitalize the genre of Romans, which is still a love and I can not since more than a decade Ridley Scott and Russell Crowe will take you to the modern.

The danger of deception is undeniable when you sell something that's really not. And The Legion of the Eagle is not a Roman film. At least, not one to use. Ie Romans displayed, but Rome was not. The film has two very clear parts. In the first, Marcus Aquila (a sosísimo Channing Tatum) tries to earn the respect of their own in a place in Britain occupied by the Empire, though weighed down by the misfortune of being the son of a Roman soldier who disappeared with the prized golden eagle of the Ninth (which gives the film its title in Spain) and is rumored to be a traitor. In the second part, and after being away from the army for reasons we should see on the screen, is introduced with his slave Esca (a much more interesting Jamie Bell) into enemy territory to find the eagle and know what became of her father. If it is the first part of Romans, the second is easily interchangeable with any other movie medieval swords or of alien cultures. Lack narrative and visual coherence to the film succeed.

The first half of the film rises above the average for similar titles have been in recent years (Roman or otherwise) as mentioned Centurion or King Arthur . Segment is a good shot and very smart. Shame not to have a protagonist with more charisma. Or have surrounded the better. For Donald Sutherland, destined to become one of the names of the film, is formed with a secondary role and rather inane, which simply wanders around the screen without finding a real reason you're in it. Bell, however, it offers everything interesting that has a narrative film. His slave character gradually gains the trust of his master is pretty cliché, but knows how to do theirs. Sure with a few inches and a good physical workout, Bell could have done a better player than Tatum. Neither the usually fascinating Mark Strong (hard even recognize) get to lift the second half of the movie with a confusing and diffuse character.

The drop rate accusing the film after the battle at the gates of the Roman position is enormous. The misuse of time and ellipses from there, a pity. And yet, the director of the film and offered in their previous two works ( of Play and The Last King of Scotland ) two notable examples of how to lead a good story. It is true that in those two titles had a strong support in the distribution here, unfortunately, it fails. In any case, yes there are some interesting notes in both parts of the film, which is what makes that interest is maintained despite the flaws of the narrative. Entertaining but not excited. His action scenes (the aforementioned attack and the final climax, once accepted the unlikely turn of the forces equals liza) are effective. Some dialogues, more than interesting. But the set is flagging. We will continue waiting for the film recover the lost splendor Romans, but at least we have products like this to get something to eat.

Hidden Blade Blue Brints

Right 'Invasion Earth'

After the fiasco that meant Skyline , all eyes were on Invasion Earth (the English title disastrous Battle: Los Angeles , what you see in the film it say the original and not translated). And although it is a fun right, not the film becomes wanted to be. They said it should become a cross between Independence Day (assuming that picking the best of course) and Black Hawk Down . That is, the war in its purest form but as an enemy alien. And it is only in part, because it entertains entertain themselves, if one is able to forget their many topics, but does not reach the rawness and realism you expect. In this way, it stays in one more film about alien invasion, far below the level of the great classics of the genre of Nos 50 and 60 (and, why not say the undervalued The War of the Worlds Steven Spielberg), but as a good example of what an invasion would be seen only from the standpoint of the army ... American, of course.

This is perhaps the greatest contribution Invasion Earth, the military standpoint. It is true that some films featured in the genus (eg, the same Independence Day), but so far no unique view of the conflict as told. Everything they see, feel and live the American marines, to the point that no information is provided on a visually interesting aliens, but due to this approach, little developed. The Marines themselves have been actors in a thousand movies, so we are led to see clichés. The Marine about to retire, the Marine who lost a brother in the battlefield and blames his boss, the Marine who risks everything to save the civilians, the Marine patriot who does everything he can for his country, Marine who always played hard Michelle Rodriguez ("continuing his role in Avatar ?)... Everything is here. In fact, there are many criticisms that have been primed in this film, as a recruitment brochure of the Marines (it is), and that contaminates exacerbated criticism often made to a product of American patriotic exaltation.

There is, it is absurd to deny it, because This episode of war with aliens invaded many cities but only see Los Angeles. But does not have to bother much. That is, if Spain was a world power in this film entertainment (it is, just in case you have to clear it), surely there would be many genre films set in Spain. The power is the United States, then the stars without having to involve an element against. There is no narrative or visual problems resulting from this fact. But annoying. Curious. Who is not offended by the absolute role of the Marines, may come to feel entertained by this movie, that after all is the only objective. The big problem with, say, is in the topics that the situations we have already seen, there is not much risk in any field or in history or in the form of shoot. The script offers little new evidence and even misses some characters (the Monyahan Bridget and Michael Peña, undoubtedly).

Best of Invasion Earth, besides the usual scenes of destruction on a large scale (which, despite everything and probably for budgetary reasons, low-craving, there is too much debris and little insight into how buildings crumble, too little consequence and great show), is Aaron Eckhart. Rarely is one to one actor so dedicated to a science fiction movie as is the case here. Many argue that the green screen distracts them, many do not take seriously the stories that star. Eckhart, who would have been the real revelation of The Dark Knight if the grand performance and the death of Heath Ledger would not have eclipsed in part, is a superb actor who is cast behind the movie with ease and commendable professionalism. With him, the topics do not have and forget, because he does everything he does credible on screen.

Of course, the film leaves the usual open-ended, which partly further limiting its scope as a product. It's the battle of Los Angeles, yes, but if it succeeds, we can stretch one or two more films also OK to leave half the story. To that end, something sharp, the fact is that Earth Invasion fulfills its mission, the rightly occupy almost two hours from the time of the viewer. It is not the definitive film about alien invasions, but a more than decent and sincere attempt to create a film of entertainment and visual effects. Just been working and, in case anyone wants to compare, is infinitely better than that product called Skyline (do not forget that at the premiere of that attempted put in a sack like both films because the directors of Skyline , the nefarious brothers Strause, were accused of plagiarism by working on the design of visual effects Invasion Earth). If anyone expected something else, and that is caused, who tries to sell as more of what is sure to be a disappointment.

Can I Get A Replacement Ih8 Remote

'Little Red Riding Hood', failed reinvention

's reinvention of classic (and not so classic) is on the agenda and the concept, by itself, does not have to be negative. However, not understanding the material that is reinventing itself may produce failed results. Riding Hood Red is, unfortunately, a good example of this phenomenon. The classic tale by Charles Perrault popularized by the Brothers Grimm first and then is turned into an intrigue of love and murder, all mixed with werewolves and priests able to combat the threat of lycanthropy, translating these into a script full of topics at all levels: in the individual characters in the love triangle, the supposed savior of the people and how other characters react to him and even in solving the mystery. That leads to an end more than expected, although the film's director, Catherine Hardwicke (Twilight responsible, and that is but a clear signal of what it offers Little Red Riding Hood) to work towards truffles footage with false leads and unresolved issues.

Use the title of Little Red Riding Hood is as an excuse to ensure the inevitable task of marketing the cinema than as a basis for the movie plot. Forget the classic tale, this will help avoid disappointment and odious comparisons, and parts of the story here says. Valerie is in love with a child of a woodcutter named Peter and wants to marry him, but his family has decided to wed someone much richer, the village blacksmith's son, Henry. In this context, there is a murder that the villagers blame the wolf, a creature that is said was two decades without attacking through the offerings they made but now is back. We have the wolf in the story, here, we discover immediately, is a werewolf than a wolf. To combat it, comes to town the Father Solomon, a famous enemy of witches and demons. The setting of the village and the forest is undoubtedly the best of Little Red Riding Hood . Is the most accomplished and, that in quotes, the best character in the film.

, however, remains untapped because there ianterés to generate a horror story (although that the theme of the film is "Who are you afraid?") and Hardwicke focus is on characters who either fail or pass, starting with the protagonist, a beautiful but cold image. Amanda Seyfried is Little Red Riding Hood, Valerie indeed (becomes, in fact, Little Red Riding Hood with a poor plot twist and forced, as forced as the reason for returning to dress for much of the footage), and its interpretation is highly implausible. It brings sparkle to the classic image of innocence of the character, not sexuality that needs to clear the love triangle that puts Hardwicke and does not appear too comfortable with the special effects that move around (Her face to face confrontation. There is much to scratch his character, although on paper had many more possibilities you see in the film (eg the same epilogue would have been a most daring and courageous film even further alloy of Little Red Riding Hood myth ).

Gary Oldman, Julie Christie and Virginia Madsen are called to give a touch of class to the film. They're both great actors, but none seem to believe at all their papers. Christie gives life the grandmother's story, and it is intended precisely to establish a link between the classic story and this film, but more likely the chosen scene to carry out this mission causes laughter in the audience. Madsen is perhaps the most exciting character in the film, as Oldman unleashes the histrionics that characterized some of his previous characters, but raises the level of entertainment, too topical. Unfortunately, like most things in Red Riding Hood. Even if someone is so long in the theater room you see the movie, the final shock after the credits, which is also coming. Lukas Haas plays the local priest and is surely at least the topic of the film. Unfortunately, his character remains largely untapped and only appears in a film that does not changes from a youthful fun.

If this scheme with reference to Twilight is inevitable, it also seems to be a less expected of the forest . Not the quality of the film, because of M Night Shyamalan is a disturbing tale and very well orchestrated, well away from the failed proposal Red Riding Hood, but for the environment in which Hardwicke put the mystery of this story. The mystery is, of course, know who and why the wolf kills. It is a mystery that is not well taken. Apart from the predictable or not likely to be the resolution (for me it was), the development is awkward and tricky. The movie is not honest does not have everything you would need to have too many things and has the sole purpose of confusing the viewer. Much noise and little history in much of what is counted, which results in the elimination of some meaningless characters that appear to have no importance and influence of others who do may have given much play. Little Red Riding Hood is a mistaken translation of a classic tale that can be visually satisfying, but provides no narrative level too.

Mera Naam Jokar Hot Movies

story 'I'm number four' and yet another beginning of a fantastic saga

There are fields in which it can be stated categorically that Hollywood has run out of ideas. 'm the number four is the demonstration that the stuff of science fiction or fantasy and juvenile court are all equal. The same characters, same problems, the same development, the same enemies ... and the same claim that the adaptation of the book is the first chapter of his stories involve the beginning of a long and successful series of films. Is the price you pay for the success of franchises like Harry Potter or Twilight. A price that has made many films and is apparently identical to that I'm number four. From that, without being anything special other are more pronounced as Ga'Hoole. The legend of the Guardians Eragon or , until the horrible as The Golden Compass, through the inane as or Jumper The Chronicles of Narnia (the fiasco that is the third installment obligation to put here.) It all sounds so similar. 'm number four is more science fiction than fantasy, but the base is the same. Handsome young boys face the supposed mission of their lives with an open end. Well worth it.

And the bad thing is that this is not another example of science fiction, but is that always so bored that similar traffic along different paths, far, far away from the river of imagination that showed the same gender in those distant years yearned and 80. I said that number four was a kind of Twilight of science fiction. Without having gone through the romantic-vampire saga lycanthropic me up so little interest, I think it is quite probable that these views are correct. So, why this has been successful and it does not (in the U.S. have earned less than your budget, although the international market investment saves some slack)? Hard to say. Perhaps the players have not prompted the same fervor in fans, perhaps there has been no material time that the literary saga accumulate so many fans (want to be a series of six books, first published in 2010 and the second will be released this summer, the rights to the film were bought even before one could buy the book). There is talk of sequel, but it is still a premature discussion. Hollywood.

The big problem I'm having number four is that it has things like we have to know them without explanation. What I do mind is that we're going to see the epic of nine young aliens who have fled from extinction at the hands of a violent and dangerous race from another planet and are hiding on Earth as normal people and under the protection of a guardian. We do not have names, just numbers. We know they are dying in order. And obviously, we know that the first three have already died, because otherwise we would have a problem with the title and numbering of the protagonist. "The order is good for something? We do not know. What good are the marks on the leg that will occur at number four with the death of their companions? We do not know. Where the hell out this dog and why? We do not know. Why have taken years to kill the first two and only a few days to find the third and fourth? We do not know. Why the hell the guardian does not seem to know anything anything until it is not much? We do not know. The film moves blindly through a very simple reason: no one knows where the story goes, because not even been published. It seems silly, but it is not.

Da whole feeling that I number four film is a photocopy of I book number four, as with all these sagas already mentioned. Hollywood does not want to risk with these films at all (if there is a story that had potential is the number six, not that of this number four). And seeing this show, one wonders why there is no greater courage and greater adaptation work. This film was crying out for an impressive introduction, full of special effects here are only for the final climax and laid the foundations for a good sci-fi saga. We do not, and so the film is from the beginning in a routine attempt to make money with some success and with some force in the development of the last half hour, all you really have interest after a very long (and inconceivable times naive) time is introduced (which is a painful epilogue just before the final battle in which the main couple, pursued by half a dozen alien murderers and their lives danger ... go to a school to disclose a roll of film to strengthen how much you want).

That all follow a predetermined basis is logical if we consider that there are no big names in the project. The most important is Michael Bay, who acts as producer (and, sure, it's who has led to explode things down on his films as director, I must say). DJ Caruso directs, director of Lives with Angelina Jolie and Disturbia Eagle Eye with Shia LaBeouf , and it does a very impersonal. The actors meet what is expected of them, which look attractive and handsome (as are) doing nothing unusual (do not). That is, Alex Pettyfer and Dianna Agron are more of the same guys who aspire to be photogenic actors. All have limited experience and only Teresa Palmer (number six) has had some impact with the childish The Sorcerer's Apprentice. Not much. The character of guardian rests Timothy Oliphant (the villain of Die Hard 4.0 ), and clearly required an actor of greater charisma and fame to the film to have a certain aura of prestige that never comes to achieving although quite entertaining at times.

best is in the end, in that fight on several fronts, well shot and well developed, even well resolved (except for the final detail of the dog or the epilogue buenrollista impossible to believe). It's one more, one like any other, to spend more or less pleasant ratillo and never leave any dregs. Nothing new on the horizon, but nothing too terrible to rant out of the cinema. Yourselves.

Can You Use Lanolin On Dog's Nipples

youth 'Blind Fury', the bad ... the fun

say that Nicolas Cage has spent years in the doldrums is nothing new. In fact, it was never gifted for this performance. But it's still a guy who continues to make films. Many. And usually pretty bad, of course (no more to remember their last two The Sorcerer's Apprentice and witches in time). I do not know how or why, but still convincing producers and directors to be given the prominence of his films. Blind Fury is the ultimate. Nicolas Cage And if we add a dash crazy, a phrase memorably horrific, a tone of parody within the parody itself, a 3D shooting children, the cute blond girl minifaldera usual, the protagonist topicazo of surly-but-for-good -heart, a touch of fantasy and lots and lots and lots of wild and uncontrolled action ... it remains so bad that the strength sports. Because, make no mistake, Blind Fury is a bad movie. Very bad. But as you know it is truly beyond the border of laughter and entertainment with amazing ease.

And anyone who tries to find something sensible Blind Fury takes really clear. Already in the first scene are exposed the pretensions of the film. If you do not pilláis grace, if you do not think at least "go frikadas Martian now this guy has done" with a smile, leave it, this is not your movie, because there are 100 minutes in the same tone. Nicolas Cage's own it is almost a parody of itself, the action hero who for years has worked to interpret. Verle garb to the Terminator (topped with the inevitable sunglasses and a blond toupee ...) wakes up and hilarity. But add to his first appearance a 3D topic of bullets directed at the camera and shotgun barrels that seek to exceed the screen and invade the stalls is the shot you need to prepare this introduction: Blind Fury going to be a chaos, that's the thought that the scene required a priori and a surreal prologue wake. Then it turns out that the prologue is explained, as we are not only before a delirious action movie, but it is a fantasy tale joyously absurd.

clarify these assumptions, failure to submit the inevitable: the blonde who accompany Nicolas Cage during the whole film, sometimes with a very short jeans, sometimes with a complete cowboy set, always with a very low-necked white shirt, sometimes with braces, sometimes covered by a jacket but always so impossible to spot as the face of the beautiful actress to have marks of the wounds of the many fights that are just getting into. Actress Amber Heard is chosen, a model that still looks beautiful film that put his picture on the more web pages better and so far had only known for playing the same character that Charlize Theron young North Country. When her character, Piper, says that the "fucking devil worshipers" one does not know if it is immersed in the surreal world of The Big Lebowski or if, conversely, is attending this festival fireworks, erotic and run riot. The fact is that every time it jumps a phrase as memorable as the previous one, laughter is inevitable. Is that what you were looking for the perpetrators of the movie? One can only think so, so, for his sincerity, almost deserve applause.

The director and writer of this (if, again, will see the humor appropriate) outrage is hilarious Patrick Lussier, editor a handful of movies from the 90, including the saga Scream and Dracula 2001 director , White Noise 2 or A Bloody Valentine. Dubious credentials. His way of shooting was close to that of any other. Much noise, many explosions, slow motion planes scattered here and there. More or less as usual. And so everything is in the hands of grace that might raise your script and the charisma of the actors. And if Nicolas Cage has something, even to hate him, the truth is that the master of this movie, with permission from Amber Heard and his fight against another woman naked in the street (yes, as is), William Fitchner is a very common side's last appearance was featured in the opening scene of The Dark Knight. He, better than anyone, understands the nonsense tone that requires the film and, especially, his character so you can have a minimum acceptance.

The truth is that there are not many laps to give. This is a film in which a mysterious man has a dangerous mission, rescuing a baby from a satanic cult that aims to sacrifice to change the established order. By the way, get an attractive woman accompanying him, there will be some nudity, many explosions, fights all type (I forgive you going to insist on the fight between Amber Heard and a naked woman, because it does not have to say that Nicolas Cage kills four types while, and I say as stars in a sex scene and does not plan to bet on this sequence, go ...), and 3D special effects almost as parodic as the tone of the film and a final climax, which of course lead to an epilogue open, lest the invention to be successful and everything. Are beginning to put these Martian fashion where there is no catch but, in essence, have their point. Only viewers in the mood and the right company, but it has its point. Even as a film by Nicolas Cage. Even though anyone who reads what I write think I've gone crazy.

Can Puppies Die Vomit

Superheroes coming

In the coming months many superhero that will leap from comics to the movies. In addition to those mentioned here, should also be talking about the highly anticipated The Dark Knight Rises (third installment of Batman by Christopher Nolan, with the additions of Anne Hathaway as Catwoman and Tom Hardy as Bane), Superman: Man of Steel (new reboot the hero of Metropolis to take Nolan to the script and production, as director Zack Snyder, Henry Cavill com Superman, Lois Amy Adams as Lane and Kevin Costner and Diane Lane as Jonathan and Martha Kent) or The Avengers (the meeting by Joss Whedon of all Marvel heroes who have jumped to the big screen in recent years), but they have not begun shooting and no promotional photos available yet, so I have to stay for an upcoming review ...

· Thor

The Norse god of thunder movie jumps to the hand of Kenneth Branagh. Many consider him undirector finished, and it is true that years ago shows no mastery of the beginning, but I think Thor has set before him a opportunity to redeem himself, to prove it has a future and to break into a serious action movie adult. That does not mean that the first photos that were distributed frightened for him. More than gods of Asgard seemed Knights of the Zodiac, but the trailer and the movie names reassured thing, because the casting seem very wise. Chris Hemsworth plays Anthony Hopkins Thor and Odin, leading a great cast full of familiar names and which also features Natalie Portman as Jane Foster, the human who falls for the Norse god on Earth. Festival promises to be a novel action for Branagh, but also have an important sediment yes it works well for the finger to a director who made his name in films adapted from Shakespeare. Arrives in late April and I look impacencia.

· X-Men. First Generation

Another reboot singing. After the end of the saga of X-Men with the third film (directed by Brett Ratner, who picked up pre-production work and the first two movies of Bryan Singer), an outcome that angered many fans (but that to me I felt right beyond the loose inerpretación the evolution of Jean Grey in Phoenix), Wolverine was a clear trip (both its sequel, now underway, has been delayed by the departure of its director intended, the overvalued Darren Aronofsky). This First Generation has nothing to do with the comic and will be a sort of prequel to the films already known. Fox does not appear to have much faith in it, as announced X-Men 4 and 5 revisiting the story where her third and forgetting it as a basis to continue the narrative. The fact is that the trailer announces good things, as good as the appealing cast. Must await the beginning of June to see if we have a good direction to the most famous Marvel mutants or if a new fiasco forget.

· Green Lantern

Ryan Reynolds is by no means the best possible Hal Jordan. Maybe some other of the Green Lantern comic book it could have been, but it is difficult to fit as Hal Jordan, and more after him as Deadpool in Wolverine or discovering more or less comic vein that under the trailer, will have this movie. That's what you can do a skid. To his credit, plays what is sensed as a great visual spectacle (although the redesign of the suit, to something completely different than the comic shows, and some characters are as Kilowog also points to negative and unnecessary stabbing fan ever) and the office that usually deploy from the direction of Martin Campbell in genre films (the devilishly entertaining credits include The Mask of Zorro or the early films of Pierce Brosnan and Daniel Craig as James Bond, Goldeneye and Casino Royale ). See Mark Strong as the evil Sinestro continues to this day the greatest attraction of this film. The cocktail can be very interesting or stay more than a little movie superheroes. It opens in the second half of June.

· Capitán América. El primer Vengador

Una que empezó mal y que poco a poco ha ido enderezando su rumbo. Mal porque la elección de Chris Evans (la Antorcha Humana en las dos películas de Los 4 Fantásticos ) parecía un claro error, y mal porque su director, Joe Johnston, venía de ofrecer una de las peores películas en muchos años, El hombre lobo . Pero las primeras fotos mostraban una interesante producción de época (la epopeya del Capitán América comienza en el cómic durante la Segunda Guerra Mundial) y una más que notable caracterización, tanto del héroe como del villano (Hugo Weaving dando vida a un Sinister Red Skull), which confirmed the trailer and the images we've seen. Tommy Lee Jones and Stanley Tucci also give luster to a very good deal. The thing may end up running, especially if the special effects work as they should (and in the simplest things like watching the shield flying hero) and become a very pleasant surprise and the final chapter before seeing all the Avengers together in the film by Joss Whedon. We will see in early August.

· Conan The Barbarian

smells disaster from the beginning. Jason Momoa pick up the baton left Arnold Schwarzenegger as Conan in the first half of the 80's, and that's saying a lot. True, Arnie was not exactly the version that showed the hero in comics, but physically he was unsurpassed. Momoa nowhere near what you'd expect to see Conan and a lot will have to paddle to convince people. It has spread since the first trailer in which only a few images are blurred in smoke. If being so near the opening, in August, we have not yet seen a moving scene of this Conan most likely means that either do not believe their own responsibility. Marcus Nispel directs that (author of the remakes of Texas Chainsaw Massacre , The guide Gorge or Friday 13 ) does not seem a good news for fans of the Cimmerian barbarian. A picture and a poster if they look decent, and gives the impression that the appearance of this wild world can be as salvageable. Perhaps surprising, but it seems unlikely.

· Wonder Woman

Years and years of speculation about a Wonder Woman movie have ended with the announcement that it will be a television series ... if the pilot convinced. However, there still is not buried the idea of \u200b\u200bmaking a film, which could even live with the adaptation of the small screen. Not many days ago was published the first picture of Adrianne Palicki dressed like the Amazon's most famous DC Comics and a few days later saw the first pictures of the shoot ... where the suit had been modified. It looks better in the shooting in his debut, but it still looks weird. How rare is to see Palicki trying to be Wonder Woman, perhaps the heroin which seems more difficult to hit (largely because Lynda Carter in the 70 series has long been a sort of Wonder Woman final). They wanted to mix the traditional uniform and latest amendments and time is a rare amalgam. If you have a good script and rolled effectively, convince. If not, what is difficult. Not yet known when the pilot episode will be released.

· The Amazing Spider-Man

Another controversial end to a trilogy, Spiderman of Sam Raimi, led to a reboot . And a reboot has a funny story, because he entrusted to a semidesconocido, Marc Webb (director of 500 days together.) Andrew Garfield demonstrated in Social Network is a good actor and can be a great Peter Parker, but his age does not fit the teen apparently Spiderman is to recover in this movie. Emma Stone also look good as Gwen Stacy, the first girlfriend of the hero in comics. The first promotional pictures and clips have sat as cold water, because the costume of the hero is strange, different from the traditional. It seems that a lot and want to innovate closer to the Ultimate version of the classic Marvel hero. At this point we do not know much about the history, except that the villain will be the Lizard, which makes this film is a huge unknown. Sam Raimi left the bar very high, especially with his first two films, which shows great comic and live action film marriage are able to offer fun and entertainment in abundance. We will see in a lot, in July 2012.